Skip to main content

Weigh In

The questions being decided in Washington and the states right now. Read both sides, pick your position, and send it to the people who represent you. We don’t take sides β€” you do.

7 people have weighed in
Running a campaign? β†’
Sort:

50 issues

infrastructureFederalπŸ“„ H.R. 8870
0

Should Congress pass the five-year BUILD America 250 highway and transit bill?

The federal highway, transit, and rail programs authorized by the 2021 infrastructure law expire September 30. The House's five-year replacement β€” the BUILD America 250 Act (H.R. 8870), reported from committee 62-2 in May at a topline committee summaries put near $580 billion β€” would set national surface transportation policy into the 2030s. It awaits a tax-committee piece on Highway Trust Fund financing before a floor vote, the Senate has not released its own bill, and the pending stopgap would extend current programs only to December 11. Supporters and critics disagree over its balance between highways and transit, rail, and clean-transportation programs. Where do you stand?

economyFederalπŸ“„ H.R. 5484
0

Should Congress pass a long-term flood insurance extension before the program expires September 30?

The National Flood Insurance Program provides most residential flood coverage in the U.S., and its authorization expires September 30 β€” mid-hurricane season. In a lapse, FEMA generally cannot sell or renew policies, which can stall thousands of home closings in flood zones. For years Congress has extended the program in short increments attached to spending bills (the pending stopgap would push it only to December 11) rather than passing a multi-year reauthorization like the bipartisan H.R. 5484, while the program owes the Treasury more than $20 billion from past catastrophes. Where do you stand?

agricultureFederalπŸ“„ H.R. 9830
0

Should Congress repeal the coming ban on hemp-derived THC products and regulate them instead?

A provision enacted in November 2025 rewrites the federal definition of hemp, which industry analysts estimate would make roughly 95% of current hemp-derived THC products β€” delta-8, gummies, beverages β€” federally unlawful starting November 12, 2026. The bipartisan Lawful Hemp Protection Act (H.R. 9830) would instead keep naturally derived hemp products legal under federal rules like age limits and testing while still targeting high-potency synthetic intoxicants. Thirty-five state attorneys general have urged Congress to keep the ban; the Senate's stopgap bill would delay most of it only to December 11, so Congress faces the choice this fall. Where do you stand?

civil rightsFederalπŸ“„ S. 1318 (House substitute)
0

Should Congress revive the lapsed Section 702 foreign surveillance program?

Section 702 of FISA lets intelligence agencies collect the communications of non-Americans abroad from U.S. providers without individual warrants β€” and Americans' messages swept in alongside them can be searched by the FBI. The House passed a three-year reauthorization in April (as an amendment to S. 1318), without the warrant requirement privacy advocates sought; the Senate declined to take it up, and the authority lapsed in June β€” an unprecedented gap for a program officials call the government's most valuable intelligence tool. Existing court certifications keep some collection running temporarily while negotiations continue this fall. Where do you stand?

economyFederalπŸ“„ H.R. 6500
0

Should Congress pass the stopgap bill funding the government through December 11?

None of the twelve annual spending bills for fiscal 2027 has passed, and government funding runs out October 1. The Senate passed a stopgap 90-6 in August (riding H.R. 6500) that extends current funding through December 11 and adds provisions the House's narrower version lacked: delaying a new rule requiring political appointees to approve federal grants, delaying most of the new hemp-THC restrictions, and extending flood insurance and highway programs. The House passed its own version 220-205 largely along party lines and must now decide whether to accept the Senate bill when it returns in September. Where do you stand?

foreign policyFederalπŸ“„ S. 4784
0

Should the Senate pass the FY2027 defense authorization bill?

The National Defense Authorization Act (S. 4784) sets Pentagon policy and authorizes weapons programs, readiness accounts, and military pay for fiscal 2027. Congress has enacted an NDAA every year since 1961, and the House passed its companion 216-212 in July. But Senate Democrats voted unanimously in July against taking the bill up, saying they will not advance a record defense bill while the administration fights a conflict with Iran that Congress never voted to authorize; the bill's supporters say a must-pass troop bill should not be held over a separate dispute senators can raise through amendments. A third floor attempt is expected after the Senate returns September 14. Where do you stand?

environmentFederalπŸ“„ S. 5249
0

Should the U.S. fast-track licensing for domestic nuclear fuel plants?

The MORE American Fuel Act (S. 5249), a bipartisan bill introduced in August 2026, would streamline how the Nuclear Regulatory Commission licenses uranium enrichment facilities: construction could begin at the applicant's own risk once an application is docketed, and mandatory hearings would be dropped when no one requests one β€” while keeping environmental review and public hearing rights. The goal is cutting U.S. reliance on foreign enriched uranium as data-center electricity demand surges. Supporters say outdated licensing is the bottleneck to energy independence; critics warn trimming hearings erodes independent safety review. Where do you stand?

civil rightsFederalπŸ“„ H.R. 1074
0

Should Supreme Court justices serve 18-year terms instead of life?

The Supreme Court Term Limits and Regular Appointments Act (H.R. 1074) would establish 18-year active terms for Supreme Court justices, with a new appointment every two years; senior justices would rotate to a limited role rather than leave the bench, which sponsors argue makes the change possible by statute rather than constitutional amendment. The bill is sponsored only by Democrats - Senate Democrats reintroduced a companion in July 2026 - and has drawn no Republican support. Supporters say staggered terms would lower the stakes of each confirmation; opponents say the Constitution's grant of tenure "during good Behaviour" means life tenure that only a constitutional amendment can change. Where do you stand?

technologyFederalπŸ“„ H.R. 5061
0

Should local police get power to disable threatening drones?

The Counter-UAS Authority Security, Safety, and Reauthorization Act (H.R. 5061) would renew federal counter-drone authorities and β€” for the first time β€” pilot letting designated state and local law enforcement detect, track, and disable drones that threaten stadiums, airports, and public events. The committee approved it 60-0, and the current state/local pilot authority expires September 30, 2026, forcing the question this fall. Supporters say expiring, patchwork authority leaves mass gatherings exposed; civil-liberties groups warn police could down journalists' and protesters' drones with no due process. Where do you stand?

economyFederalπŸ“„ S. 4160
0

Are sports prediction markets gambling β€” and should Congress treat them that way?

Platforms like Kalshi offer "event contracts" on sports outcomes under federal commodities law, bypassing state and tribal gambling regulation β€” including Nevada's. The Prediction Markets Are Gambling Act (S. 4160), co-sponsored by Nevada's Catherine Cortez Masto, would bar federally regulated exchanges from listing contracts that function as sports bets. This summer, 44 state attorneys general told the CFTC it lacks authority over sports contracts and New York sued Kalshi as an illegal gambling operation. Supporters say the loophole guts state consumer protections; opponents say these are legitimate, federally regulated markets with real informational value. Where do you stand?

economyFederalπŸ“„ S. 3623
0

Should Congress force competition in credit card swipe fees?

The Credit Card Competition Act (S. 3623) would require the largest card-issuing banks to enable at least two unaffiliated networks to route credit card transactions, breaking Visa and Mastercard's control over the 2-3% "swipe fees" merchants pay on every sale. Retailers are pushing for a 2026 vote while the card industry spends heavily to stop it β€” one of the hottest lobbying fights of the summer. Supporters say competition would save consumers billions in passed-through fees; opponents say it would gut card rewards and weaken security. Where do you stand?

infrastructureFederalπŸ“„ H.R. 4669
0

Should FEMA become an independent, cabinet-level agency?

The FEMA Act (H.R. 4669) would pull FEMA out of the Department of Homeland Security and reestablish it as an independent, cabinet-level agency, while streamlining disaster aid β€” block-grant options, faster debris removal, and simpler help for survivors. The House committee approved it 57-3, and with a new FEMA administrator confirmed and hurricane season peaking, pressure is building for a floor vote. Supporters say independence cuts red tape and speeds aid; critics say the federal disaster role should shrink, not grow. Where do you stand?

educationFederalπŸ“„ S. 4668
0

Should Congress set national rules for paying college athletes?

The Protect College Sports Act (S. 4668) would create the first federal framework for college athletics: a statutory right for athletes to earn name, image, and likeness money, one national rulebook replacing state-by-state NIL laws, scholarship and healthcare guarantees, and limited antitrust protection letting the NCAA set eligibility and transfer rules. The Senate is set to take it up in September after a floor fight stalled before recess. Supporters say it stabilizes a chaotic system; player associations say it shields the NCAA from paying athletes what a free market would. Where do you stand?

economyNVπŸ“„ NV AB 280 (2025)
0

Should Nevada cap annual rent increases for seniors?

AB 280 in Nevada's 2025 session would have capped annual rent increases at 5% for tenants 62 and older or those dependent on Social Security, and required landlords to itemize and justify fees. It passed both chambers, and Governor Lombardo vetoed it β€” his second veto of a senior rent-cap bill. Tenant advocates are using the interim to build support for a 2027 rerun. Supporters say seniors on fixed incomes are being priced out; the veto message argues rent control undermines housing affordability over time by discouraging investment. Where do you stand?

economyNVπŸ“„ NV AB 238 / AB 5 (2025)
0

Should Nevada expand film tax credits to anchor a Las Vegas studio campus?

A proposal to expand Nevada's film tax credit program by roughly $95 million a year for 15 years β€” anchoring the planned Summerlin Studios campus with Warner Bros. Discovery and Sony β€” has now failed twice: it passed the Assembly in the 2025 session but died in the Senate, and fell one vote short in a November 2025 special session. Backers are expected to try again in the 2027 session. Supporters say it would diversify Nevada's economy and create thousands of jobs; fiscal analysts told lawmakers the state would lose about 77 cents per dollar of credits. Where do you stand?

healthcareNVπŸ“„ NV Question 6
0

Should Nevada write abortion rights into the state constitution? (Question 6)

Question 6 on Nevada's November 3, 2026 ballot would establish a state constitutional right to abortion until fetal viability, or when needed to protect the patient's life or health. Nevada statute already permits abortion up to 24 weeks under a 1990 voter referendum, which the Legislature cannot change without another public vote. Supporters say the amendment would lock existing protections into the constitution; opponents say its language goes further than current law. Voters approved it 64-36 in 2024; this is the second, final vote. Where do you stand?

civil rightsNVπŸ“„ NV Question 7
0

Should Nevada require photo ID to vote? (Question 7)

Question 7 on Nevada's November 3, 2026 ballot would amend the state constitution to require photo identification to vote in person and the last four digits of a driver's license or Social Security number to vote by mail. Nevada constitutional initiatives must pass twice: voters approved it 73-27 in 2024, and this is the second, final vote. Supporters say verifying identity builds confidence in elections; opponents say it burdens eligible voters to address fraud that is extremely rare. Where do you stand?

infrastructureFederalπŸ“„ H.R. 5857
0

Should Farmers Have a Right to Repair Their Own Tractors and Equipment?

The bill would require makers to provide parts, tools, and software for farm-equipment repair. Supporters cite cost and independence; opponents cite safety and intellectual property. Where do you land?

civil rightsFederalπŸ“„ S. 3991
0

Should Political Groups Have to Disclose Their Large Donors and Ad Spending?

The bill would require groups to publicly report large political spending and top donors. Supporters cite transparency; opponents cite privacy and free-speech concerns. Where do you land?

civil rightsFederalπŸ“„ H.R. 14
0

Should Congress Restore Federal Preclearance of State Voting-Law Changes?

The bill would restore federal review of voting changes in certain jurisdictions. Supporters cite protecting voters; opponents cite federal overreach and outdated criteria. Where do you land?

civil rightsFederalπŸ“„ S. 2885
0

Should Congress Require Independent Commissions to End Partisan Gerrymandering?

The bill would require independent redistricting commissions and ban most mid-decade map changes. Supporters cite fairness; opponents cite states rights. Where do you land?

healthcareFederalπŸ“„ H.R. 3514
0

Should Congress Speed Up Medicare Advantage Prior-Authorization Decisions?

The bill would require Medicare Advantage plans to streamline prior authorization. Supporters cite faster care; opponents cite plan costs and utilization. Where do you land?

economyFederalπŸ“„ H.R. 8060
0

Should Congress Reauthorize Federal Programs That Combat Elder Abuse and Fraud?

The bill would reauthorize and update Elder Justice Act programs. Supporters cite protecting seniors; skeptics question funding levels and effectiveness. Where do you land?

healthcareFederalπŸ“„ S. 3886
0

Should Congress Restore Federal Minimum Staffing Standards for Nursing Homes?

The bill would restore federal nursing-home staffing minimums repealed in 2025. Supporters cite resident safety; opponents cite workforce shortages and cost. Where do you land?

healthcareFederalπŸ“„ H.R. 8540
0

Should Medicaid Be Required to Cover Home and Community-Based Care?

The bill would make Medicaid home and community-based services a mandatory benefit. Supporters cite ending waitlists; opponents cite state cost. Where do you land?

laborFederalπŸ“„ S. 2438
0

Should Congress Phase Out Subminimum Wages for Workers With Disabilities?

The bill would phase out Section 14(c) certificates that allow below-minimum wages. Supporters cite fair pay and integration; opponents worry some workers could lose job placements. Where do you land?

civil rightsFederalπŸ“„ H.R. 2540
0

Should Congress Raise the SSI Savings Limit From $2,000 to $10,000?

The bill would raise SSI asset limits, unchanged for decades, and index them to inflation. Supporters cite letting recipients save; opponents cite added program cost. Where do you land?

laborFederalπŸ“„ H.R. 5390
0

Should Congress Establish a National Paid Family and Medical Leave Program?

The bill would create a national paid-leave insurance program administered through SSA. Supporters cite worker and family support; opponents cite cost and payroll taxes. Where do you land?

foreign policyFederalπŸ“„ H.R. 1716
0

Should Congress Threaten to Freeze Chinese Officials' Assets to Deter a Taiwan Invasion?

The bill would report and restrict senior Chinese officials' assets if China threatens Taiwan. Supporters cite deterrence; opponents cite escalation risk. Where do you land?

foreign policyFederalπŸ“„ S. 1867
0

Should Congress End the "De Minimis" Tariff Exemption on Low-Value Imports?

The bill would end duty-free treatment for low-value shipments, especially from China. Supporters cite fair trade and enforcement; opponents cite higher consumer costs. Where do you land?

foreign policyFederalπŸ“„ S.J.Res. 104
0

Should Congress Require the President to Withdraw U.S. Forces From Hostilities With Iran?

The resolution would direct removal of U.S. forces from unauthorized hostilities against Iran. Supporters cite congressional war powers; opponents cite executive flexibility. Where do you land?

foreign policyFederalπŸ“„ S. 5025
2

Should Congress Impose Sweeping New Sanctions and Tariffs on Russia?

The bill would impose new sanctions and tariffs on Russia and its energy buyers. Supporters cite pressure on Russia; opponents cite economic and diplomatic costs. Where do you land?

foreign policyFederalπŸ“„ H.R. 2913
0

Should Congress Authorize $8 Billion in New Support and Sanctions for Ukraine?

The bill would authorize loans to Ukraine and impose sanctions on Russia. Supporters cite deterring aggression; opponents cite cost and escalation. Where do you land?

technologyFederalπŸ“„ S. 278
0

Should Congress Ban Children Under 13 From Holding Social Media Accounts?

The bill would bar under-13s from social media accounts. Supporters cite youth mental health; opponents cite enforcement and privacy trade-offs. Where do you land?

technologyFederalπŸ“„ S. 1586
0

Should App Stores Verify Users' Ages and Get Parental Consent for Minors?

The bill would require app stores to verify age and get parental consent for minors. Supporters cite child safety; opponents cite privacy and practicality. Where do you land?

technologyFederalπŸ“„ S. 1367
0

Should Congress Create a Federal Right Against AI Deepfakes of Your Voice and Likeness?

The bill would create a federal right against unauthorized AI replicas of a person's voice or image. Supporters cite protection from fraud and abuse; opponents cite free-speech and innovation concerns. Where do you land?

environmentFederalπŸ“„ H.R. 513
0

Should Congress Limit the President's Power to Block Offshore Drilling?

The bill would curb presidential withdrawals of offshore areas from oil and gas leasing. Supporters cite energy production; opponents cite environmental protection. Where do you land?

environmentFederalπŸ“„ S. 4153
0

Should Congress Force a 10-Year Phase-Out of Non-Essential "Forever Chemicals"?

The bill would require reporting and a phase-out of non-essential PFAS. Supporters cite health and environment; opponents cite industry cost and feasibility. Where do you land?

healthcareFederalπŸ“„ S. 2035
0

Should Congress Establish a Nationwide Right to IVF?

The bill would create a statutory right to access IVF and other fertility treatment. Supporters cite family-building access; opponents cite federalism and ethical concerns. Where do you land?

healthcareFederalπŸ“„ S. 422
0

Should Congress Guarantee a Federal Right to Contraception?

The bill would create a statutory right to obtain and use contraceptives. Supporters cite securing access; opponents raise concerns about scope and conscience protections. Where do you land?

educationFederalπŸ“„ H.R. 369
0

Should Congress Abolish the U.S. Department of Education?

The bill would eliminate the department and shift its functions to states and other agencies. Supporters cite local control; opponents cite loss of federal support and civil-rights enforcement. Where do you land?

educationFederalπŸ“„ H.R. 4862
0

Should Congress Double Pell Grants and Expand Public Service Loan Forgiveness?

The bill would increase Pell Grants and ease loan forgiveness for public-service workers. Supporters cite access; opponents cite cost. Where do you land?

educationFederalπŸ“„ H.R. 8045
0

Should the Federal Government Eliminate Interest on Student Loans?

The bill would set federal student loans to accrue no interest. Supporters cite affordability; opponents cite cost to taxpayers. Where do you land?

taxationFederalπŸ“„ H.R. 8085
0

Should the U.S. Impose an Annual Wealth Tax on Fortunes Over $50 Million?

The bill would tax net worth above $50 million. Supporters cite revenue and fairness; opponents cite constitutionality and enforcement concerns. Where do you land?

taxationFederalπŸ“„ H.R. 246
0

Should Congress Raise the Cap on State and Local Tax (SALT) Deductions?

The bill would raise the SALT deduction cap above $10,000. Supporters cite relief in high-tax states; opponents say it mainly benefits higher earners. Where do you land?

veteransFederalπŸ“„ H.R. 3639
0

Should Veterans Exposed to "Forever Chemicals" (PFAS) Get Guaranteed VA Health Care?

The bill would extend VA care to veterans exposed to PFAS at bases. Supporters cite toxic-exposure fairness; opponents cite cost and scientific uncertainty. Where do you land?

veteransFederalπŸ“„ H.R. 136
0

Should the VA Be Required to Study Every Veteran Suicide and Overdose Death?

The bill would require an independent review of veterans who died by suicide or overdose after VA treatment. Supporters cite prevention; skeptics question cost and scope. Where do you land?

civil rightsFederalπŸ“„ H.R. 5361
0

Should Congress Set New Federal Standards for Police Accountability?

The bill would limit qualified immunity, restrict some use-of-force tactics, and create a misconduct registry. Supporters cite accountability; opponents cite officer recruitment and local control. Where do you land?

otherFederalπŸ“„ H.R. 5068
0

Should Congress Fully Legalize Marijuana at the Federal Level?

The MORE Act would remove marijuana from the federal Controlled Substances Act. Supporters cite states' rights and criminal-justice reform; opponents cite public-health and youth-access concerns. Where do you land?

gunsFederalπŸ“„ S. 889
0

Should Congress Fund State "Red Flag" Laws to Temporarily Remove Guns From At-Risk People?

The bill would fund extreme-risk protection order laws. Supporters cite suicide and violence prevention; opponents cite due-process concerns. Where do you land?