Should Congress revive the lapsed Section 702 foreign surveillance program?
Section 702 of FISA lets intelligence agencies collect the communications of non-Americans abroad from U.S. providers without individual warrants — and Americans' messages swept in alongside them can be searched by the FBI. The House passed a three-year reauthorization in April (as an amendment to S. 1318), without the warrant requirement privacy advocates sought; the Senate declined to take it up, and the authority lapsed in June — an unprecedented gap for a program officials call the government's most valuable intelligence tool. Existing court certifications keep some collection running temporarily while negotiations continue this fall. Where do you stand?
Weigh in
The case for
National security advocates call Section 702 the single most valuable U.S. intelligence authority — credited with disrupting terror plots, tracking fentanyl networks, and attributing cyberattacks — and note the 2024 reforms already added FBI query safeguards. They argue every month of lapse widens intelligence blind spots as court certifications expire, and Congress should renew promptly.
Source: Penn Center for Ethics and the Rule of Law →The case against
Civil liberties advocates argue Section 702 has become a domestic surveillance tool: the FBI has run large numbers of warrantless "backdoor" searches for Americans' communications, with documented abuses involving protesters, donors, and officials. They contend Congress should use the lapse as leverage to require warrants for U.S.-person queries before reviving the authority — a reform the House-passed bill omitted.
Source: Brennan Center for Justice →My Democracy doesn’t take a side — you choose your position below, and your message carries it. Sources represent one organization on each side; they don’t reflect My Democracy’s position.
10 more to reach 10
Take Action
What’s your position?
Both sides are laid out above. Your message will carry your position — My Democracy doesn’t take a side.