Should Congress End the "De Minimis" Tariff Exemption on Low-Value Imports?
The bill would end duty-free treatment for low-value shipments, especially from China. Supporters cite fair trade and enforcement; opponents cite higher consumer costs. Where do you land?
Weigh in
The case for
Ending the exemption would close a channel used to avoid tariffs and evade inspection.
Source: Senate Finance Committee →The case against
It would raise costs and paperwork on low-value consumer shipments and cross-border e-commerce.
Source: NFAP →My Democracy doesn’t take a side — you choose your position below, and your message carries it. Sources represent one organization on each side; they don’t reflect My Democracy’s position.
This campaign is about this bill
S. 1867: Closing the De Minimis Loophole ActWhat it does
Closing the De Minimis Loophole ActThis bill immediately terminates de minimis treatment for goods originating in China and phases out such treatment for goods originating from all other countries. (Current law allows for U.S. imports under a de minimis threshold of $800 per shipment to enter free of tariffs, fees, and taxes.)Specifically, de minimis treatment ends (1) with respect to goods from China, beginning on the bill's enactment date (with an exception for goods already loaded onto a vessel or in transit during the three-day period that ends on the enactment date); and (2) with respect
Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. (May 22, 2025)
10 more to reach 10
Take Action
What’s your position?
Both sides are laid out above. Your message will carry your position — My Democracy doesn’t take a side.