Should Nevada cap annual rent increases for seniors?
AB 280 in Nevada's 2025 session would have capped annual rent increases at 5% for tenants 62 and older or those dependent on Social Security, and required landlords to itemize and justify fees. It passed both chambers, and Governor Lombardo vetoed it — his second veto of a senior rent-cap bill. Tenant advocates are using the interim to build support for a 2027 rerun. Supporters say seniors on fixed incomes are being priced out; the veto message argues rent control undermines housing affordability over time by discouraging investment. Where do you stand?
Weigh in
The case for
Supporters argue seniors on fixed Social Security incomes have no way to absorb unlimited rent hikes and opaque fees in one of the nation's tightest housing markets, and that a temporary, targeted 5% cap protects the most vulnerable tenants without touching most of the market.
Source: Nevada Current →The case against
The governor's veto message argues rent caps, though well-intentioned, are likely to undermine housing affordability over time by discouraging investment in rental housing — the supply problem that drives high rents in the first place.
Source: Office of the Governor of Nevada →My Democracy doesn’t take a side — you choose your position below, and your message carries it. Sources represent one organization on each side; they don’t reflect My Democracy’s position.
10 more to reach 10
Take Action
What’s your position?
Both sides are laid out above. Your message will carry your position — My Democracy doesn’t take a side.