Should Congress set national rules for paying college athletes?
The Protect College Sports Act (S. 4668) would create the first federal framework for college athletics: a statutory right for athletes to earn name, image, and likeness money, one national rulebook replacing state-by-state NIL laws, scholarship and healthcare guarantees, and limited antitrust protection letting the NCAA set eligibility and transfer rules. The Senate is set to take it up in September after a floor fight stalled before recess. Supporters say it stabilizes a chaotic system; player associations say it shields the NCAA from paying athletes what a free market would. Where do you stand?
Weigh in
The case for
Supporters argue athletes gain a guaranteed federal right to NIL earnings plus scholarship and healthcare protections, and that one national rulebook ends a chaotic patchwork of conflicting state laws and endless litigation that no one — schools or athletes — can plan around.
Source: Senate Commerce Committee →The case against
The major professional players associations argue the bill's antitrust exemption lets the NCAA cap athlete compensation and block employment and collective bargaining — protections every other American worker and pro athlete has — locking in the schools' power under the banner of reform.
Source: Athletes.org →My Democracy doesn’t take a side — you choose your position below, and your message carries it. Sources represent one organization on each side; they don’t reflect My Democracy’s position.
This campaign is about this bill
S. 4668: Protect College Sports Act of 2026What it does
Protect College Sports Act of 2026This bill establishes requirements for name, image, or likeness (NIL) agreements for college student athletes and provides a limited antitrust exemption for schools and conferences to pool and sell certain college sports media rights. The requirements address elements of the court-approved agreement to settle In re College Athlete NIL Litigation (i.e., House settlement).First, the bill statutorily prohibits institutions, conferences, or interstate intercollegiate athletic associations (e.g., the National Collegiate Athletic Association [NCAA]) from restri
Latest action: Cloture motion on the motion to proceed to the measure presented in Senate. (CR S4449) (Aug 5, 2026)
10 more to reach 10
Take Action
What’s your position?
Both sides are laid out above. Your message will carry your position — My Democracy doesn’t take a side.