Should your community use Flock license plate cameras?
Flock Safety's automated license plate readers now scan traffic in thousands of U.S. communities, logging every passing plate into searchable databases that are often shared across agencies. Police departments credit the cameras with solving crimes and recovering stolen vehicles; privacy advocates warn they build a location history of innocent drivers with little oversight. Cities and states are now deciding whether to expand, regulate, or remove these networks. Where do you stand?
Weigh in
The case for
Supporters say ALPR networks are a force multiplier for understaffed police departments: they generate leads that help recover stolen vehicles, locate missing persons flagged in AMBER and Silver Alerts, and identify suspect vehicles after serious crimes, using cameras that photograph plates rather than faces.
Source: Flock Safety (manufacturer, supports) →The case against
Critics say the networks amount to warrantless mass tracking: they log the movements of millions of drivers who are suspected of nothing, retain and share that data across jurisdictions with limited oversight, and have produced wrongful stops when plates were misread or hotlists were stale.
Source: Electronic Frontier Foundation (opposes) →My Democracy doesn’t take a side — you choose your position below, and your message carries it. Sources represent one organization on each side; they don’t reflect My Democracy’s position.
10 more to reach 10
Take Action
What’s your position?
Both sides are laid out above. Your message will carry your position — My Democracy doesn’t take a side.