What Should Immigration Reform Look Like?
Congress remains deadlocked between enforcement-first approaches and comprehensive reform that pairs border security with legal pathways. Both sides agree the current system is broken. Where do you stand?
Weigh in
The case for
Advocates of comprehensive reform say pairing border security with due process and workable legal pathways is the only durable fix — enforcement alone hasn't worked in thirty years, and the economy depends on orderly legal immigration.
Source: American Immigration Council (favors comprehensive reform) →The case against
Advocates of enforcement-first argue the border must be demonstrably secure before any legalization, that past comprehensive deals traded amnesty for enforcement that never came, and that legal pathways should be narrowed until then.
Source: Federation for American Immigration Reform (enforcement-first) →My Democracy doesn’t take a side — you choose your position below, and your message carries it. Sources represent one organization on each side; they don’t reflect My Democracy’s position.
9 more to reach 10
Take Action
What’s your position?
Both sides are laid out above. Your message will carry your position — My Democracy doesn’t take a side.